News

It was supposed to be just another lively segment on ESPN’s morning show, the kind where analysts banter about stats, lineups, and All-Star snubs. The cameras rolled, the hosts smiled, and Angel Reese—one of the brightest new stars in the WNBA—sat quietly, basking in the glow of a breakout season. But then, Monica McNutt, respected analyst and former pro herself, leaned forward and dropped a line that would send shockwaves through the sports world:

“If Angel Reese were white, she’d be No.1 — not No.13.”

The studio fell silent. No one flinched. No one clapped. Even Reese looked stunned. The hosts tried to move on, but the words lingered, heavy and electric, as if the air itself had changed. The cameras kept rolling, but the internet wasn’t letting go. Within moments, clips of the exchange were everywhere—on Twitter, Instagram, TikTok. The debate had begun, and the question was clear: Had the WNBA’s All-Star selection system just been exposed for what it really is?

Breaking Down the Broadcast: The Lead-Up, the Line, and the Fallout

To understand the magnitude of McNutt’s statement, you have to look at the context. Angel Reese, in her rookie season, has been nothing short of sensational. She led the fan vote for All-Star selections, dominated every statistical category that matters—points, rebounds, double-doubles—and became the face of a new generation of women’s basketball. Yet, when the All-Star starters were announced, Reese’s name was nowhere to be found. She’d made the roster, yes, but as a reserve—No.13 on the list.

It was a snub that defied logic. The numbers didn’t lie: Reese was outperforming veterans, outshining big-name stars, and, most importantly, connecting with fans in a way few rookies ever do. So why wasn’t she a starter? That’s the question McNutt put front and center, refusing to let the moment pass as just another controversy.

Her claim—raw, unvarnished, and deeply uncomfortable—wasn’t just about Reese. It was about race, perception, and the invisible forces that still shape women’s sports.

The Numbers: Reese’s Dominance vs. the All-Star Voting System

Let’s look at the data. In the weeks leading up to the All-Star announcement, Reese led the league in rebounds and double-doubles. She was top five in scoring and top three in steals. Her impact on the Chicago Sky was immediate and profound—the team’s win-loss record improved, attendance spiked, and merchandise sales soared.

The fan vote reflected this. Reese finished first overall, beating out established stars like A’ja Wilson and Breanna Stewart. On social media, she was everywhere—highlight reels, interviews, viral TikTok dances. She was, by every metric, the people’s choice.

Yet, the final All-Star lineup was determined by a weighted system: 50% fan vote, 25% players, 25% media. Reese’s fan support was overwhelming, but the votes from players and media dragged her down. The result? No.13. Not a starter.

For many, the math didn’t add up. For others, it was a familiar story.

The History: Race, Recognition, and the WNBA’s Ongoing Struggle

Women’s basketball has always wrestled with questions of visibility, equity, and bias. The WNBA, now in its third decade, has made strides in promoting diversity and inclusion. But beneath the surface, old patterns persist.

Black athletes—especially those who play with swagger, confidence, and unapologetic flair—have often been scrutinized more harshly than their white counterparts. Their celebrations are called “showboating.” Their leadership is called “attitude.” Their mistakes are magnified. Their successes, sometimes, are minimized.

Angel Reese knows this better than most. Her college career at LSU was marked by both triumph and controversy. When she waved her hand in front of her face—a gesture borrowed from men’s basketball—it became a national debate. Was she too confident? Too bold? Or just too Black for some fans’ comfort?

Monica McNutt’s statement wasn’t just about one player; it was about a system that, despite its best intentions, still struggles to see and celebrate Black excellence without reservation.

The Silence in the Studio: Why No One Reacted

The moment McNutt spoke, the studio fell silent. It wasn’t the silence of agreement or disagreement—it was the silence of reckoning. Race is the third rail of sports commentary, especially in women’s leagues where the audience is diverse but the power structures remain stubbornly traditional.

No one flinched. No one clapped. Even Reese, usually quick with a smile or a quip, seemed taken aback. The hosts tried to move on, but the line had already been drawn. The internet, meanwhile, erupted.

Some praised McNutt’s courage. Others accused her of “playing the race card.” But for many, the question was unavoidable: If Reese’s stats, charisma, and fan support weren’t enough, what was holding her back?

The Internet Reacts: Hashtags, Hot Takes, and the Demand for Answers

Within hours, #AngelReeseNo1 was trending. Fans posted side-by-side comparisons of Reese and other All-Stars. Analysts weighed in, some cautiously, others with full-throated support.

“She’s the most dominant rookie we’ve seen in years,” tweeted former WNBA MVP Tamika Catchings. “If she’s not a starter, the system needs fixing.”

Others pointed to historical snubs—Candace Parker, Sylvia Fowles, Maya Moore—all Black stars who, at various points, were overlooked despite their accomplishments.

The league, meanwhile, stayed quiet. No official statement. No explanation beyond the voting formula. But the pressure was mounting.

The All-Star System: Fairness, Transparency, and the Path Forward

At the heart of the controversy is the All-Star selection process itself. The WNBA’s weighted voting system is designed to balance fan enthusiasm with insider expertise. In theory, it prevents popularity contests from overshadowing merit. In practice, it can amplify biases—both conscious and unconscious.

Players, for example, may vote based on personal relationships, team rivalries, or unwritten codes about “paying dues.” Media members, despite their expertise, bring their own preferences and blind spots. The fan vote, while powerful, is sometimes dismissed as “casual” or “uninformed.”

The result is a system that can—and often does—produce outcomes that defy logic. Angel Reese’s snub is just the latest example.

The Broader Significance: Race, Representation, and the Future of Women’s Sports

Monica McNutt’s on-air statement is more than a viral moment. It’s a call to examine how race shapes recognition in women’s sports. For Black athletes, the path to stardom is often steeper, the scrutiny harsher, the rewards more elusive.

The WNBA, to its credit, has been a leader in social justice—players have marched, spoken out, and demanded change. But when it comes to internal systems of recognition, the league faces a reckoning.

If Reese’s snub is allowed to stand without explanation, it sends a message: excellence alone is not enough. For young Black girls watching at home, the lesson is clear—work harder, shine brighter, but know that the goalposts may move.

The Players Speak Out: Solidarity and Frustration

In the days following the broadcast, players across the league weighed in. Some, like Skylar Diggins-Smith, expressed solidarity:

“Angel earned that spot. Period.”

Others, more cautious, called for a review of the voting system. “We need transparency,” said Nneka Ogwumike, president of the WNBA Players Association. “Our league is built on the voices of our players and our fans. Both deserve to be heard.”

There were also whispers of frustration—players who felt that the system rewards familiarity over innovation, comfort over challenge.

The League Responds: Promises, Policies, and the Road Ahead

Late in the week, WNBA Commissioner Cathy Engelbert issued a brief statement: “We value all our players and are committed to fairness in our All-Star selection process. We will continue to review our procedures to ensure that excellence is recognized and celebrated.”

It was, by most accounts, a measured response. But for many, it fell short. Fans wanted answers. Players wanted accountability. And Angel Reese—still No.13, still not a starter—became the symbol of a system in need of repair.

The Cultural Impact: Why This Moment Matters

Sports have always been a mirror for society’s struggles—race, gender, class, power. In the WNBA, where Black women are both the stars and the backbone of the league, moments like McNutt’s on-air bombshell force a reckoning.

Is the league ready to confront its own biases? Can it create a system where talent and impact are the only criteria that matter? Or will it continue to rely on formulas that, however well-intentioned, perpetuate inequity?

For Angel Reese, the answer is personal. For the league, it’s existential.

Solutions: Fixing the All-Star System and Beyond

If the WNBA wants to move forward, it needs more than promises. Here are steps that could restore trust and fairness:

1. Full Transparency:
Publish the breakdown of votes—fan, player, media—for every All-Star selection. Let the public see how the decisions are made.

2. Bias Training:
Provide players and media with training on unconscious bias. Help voters recognize when personal preferences might cloud judgment.

3. Weighted Adjustments:
Consider increasing the weight of the fan vote, or creating a “fan starter” slot to ensure popular players are recognized.

4. Open Dialogue:
Host forums where players, fans, and league officials can discuss the selection process. Make changes based on feedback, not just policy.

5. Celebrate Diversity:
Highlight the achievements of Black athletes not just during controversies, but year-round. Make excellence visible.

Conclusion: The Five Words That Cracked the System

Monica McNutt’s statement—“If Angel Reese were white, she’d be No.1 — not No.13”—was more than a critique. It was a challenge to the WNBA, its fans, and the sports world at large. In those five words, she exposed a system that, despite decades of progress, still struggles with the oldest and deepest divides.

The silence in the studio was telling. No one knew how to respond, because the truth is uncomfortable. But the internet did not let go, and neither should we.

Angel Reese’s journey is far from over. She will keep playing, keep dominating, and keep inspiring. But her story—like so many before her—reminds us that excellence must be recognized, not just tolerated.

As the league heads toward its next All-Star game, one question remains: Will the system change? Or will the next Angel Reese have to fight the same battles, speak the same truths, and wait for recognition that should never have been denied?

The cameras may have kept rolling, but the real story is just beginning.